Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Artigo Original

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023)

Comparative and temporal analysis of anorectal fistulas treatment in Brazil over the last 10 years: related to Covid-19?

DOI
https://doi.org/10.54257/2965-0585.v4.i2.86
Submitted
September 17, 2025
Published
2025-09-29

Abstract

Introduction: Anorectal fistulas, often stemming from perianal abscess drainage, are connections between the anorectal canal and the perianal region, with an average incidence of 8.6 per 100,000 inhabitants. Patients usually present with draining fistulae accompanied by severe symptoms, necessitating surgical intervention to prevent recurrence and incontinence. During the COVID-19 pandemic, proctological disorders have lost priority, leading to expedited diagnoses and treatments. Objectives: To conduct a temporal analysis of anorectal fistula treatment in Brazil over the past decade and identify its relationship with the pandemic. Method: A cross-sectional, documentary, and quantitative study with a sample of 102,666 procedures for closure of rectal fistula and anal fistulectomy/fistulotomy reported in the SIH/SUS between 2014-2023, available from the Department of SUS Statistics. Variables were evaluated based on the number of approved Hospital Admission Authorizations (AIH) and the nature of the care provided. Results: The number of procedures reached its minimum in 2020 (6,583), 44.9% fewer than in 2019 (11,955), attributed to reduced demand for elective care during the pandemic. Despite the overall decrease, the proportion of urgent procedures increased from 14.8% in 2019 to 25.3% in 2021, possibly due to worsening cases resulting from delayed diagnoses, without demonstrating to be a risk factor for disease recurrence. Conclusion: There was a significant reduction in the number of anorectal fistula treatments in the first two years of the pandemic, with a relative increase in the number of these procedures in urgent situations, indicating greater severity of cases at the time of intervention.

References

  1. Zahra, A. et al. A Comparison of Different Surgical Treatments for Complex Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review. Cureus, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 8, p. e28289, ago. 2022. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28289. PMID: 36176822; PMCID: PMC9512314.
  2. Mei, Z. et al. Risk Factors for Recurrence after anal fistula surgery: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), [S.l.], v. 69, p. 153-164, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.003.
  3. Maqueda Gonzalez, R. et al. Proctologic emergency consultation during COVID-19: Comparative cross-sectional cohort study. Cirugia espanola, [S.l.], v. 99, n. 9, p. 660–665, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.10.002. Acesso em: 02 mar. 2024.
  4. DATASUS. tabnet.datasus.gov.br/tabnet/tabnet.htm. URL: http://www.datasus.gov.br.
  5. Karimian, F. A Commentary on the article: "Risk factors for recurrence after anal fistula surgery: A meta-analysis", Int J Surg 2019;69:153-164. International Journal of Surgery (London, England), v. 71, p. 79, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.038.
  6. Tupe, C. L., & Pham, T. V. Anorectal Complaints in the Emergency Department. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, v. 34, n. 2, p. 251-270, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2015.12.013
  7. Lohsiriwat, V. Anorectal emergencies. World Journal of Gastroenterology, v. 22, n. 26, p. 5867–5878, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i26.5867.
  8. Gardner, I. H.; Siddharthan, R. V.; Tsikitis, V. L. Benign anorectal disease: hemorrhoids, fissures, and fistulas. Annals of Gastroenterology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 9–18, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2019.0438.
  9. Ji, L., Zhang, Y., Xu, L., Wei, J., Weng, L., & Jiang, J. (2021). Advances in the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Mini-Review of Recent Five-Year Clinical Studies. Frontiers in Surgery, 7, 586891. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.586891. PMID: 33644110; PMCID: PMC7905164.
  10. Sacco, E., et al. (2021). Extensive impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pelvic floor dysfunctions care: A nationwide interdisciplinary survey. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 40 (2), 695-704. doi: 10.1002/nau.24610.

Most read articles by the same author(s)